I analyzed entity encounters in the NUFORC sightings database. Shadowy beings: 68% of witnesses report fear. Greys: 38% involve abduction. Light beings: more awe than fear.
I analyzed 152,000 UFO sighting reports. Some patterns: triangles almost never appear during the day. Disks are 5x more likely to involve entity encounters. And the majority are silent.
I don't expect you to believe this. But I do expect you to notice the timeline: Bitcoin mining and the Mandela Effect didn't just emerge around the same time—they scaled together. Perfectly. The correlation demands an explanation, even if that explanation sounds insane.
I analyzed entity encounters in the NUFORC sightings database. Shadowy beings: 68% of witnesses report fear. Greys: 38% involve abduction. Light beings: more awe than fear.
I analyzed 152,000 UFO sighting reports. Some patterns: triangles almost never appear during the day. Disks are 5x more likely to involve entity encounters. And the majority are silent.
I don't expect you to believe this. But I do expect you to notice the timeline: Bitcoin mining and the Mandela Effect didn't just emerge around the same time—they scaled together. Perfectly. The correlation demands an explanation, even if that explanation sounds insane.
Avi Loeb just wrote a Medium article about the interstellar comet I3/Atlas - and while the comet itself is interesting, his commentary on the state of science today is the real takeaway
If we exist within a simulation, we cannot "break out" of it. This isn't a practical limitation—it's a logical impossibility. Instead can we use random behavior to let our simulators know we're on to them?
Building our own UAP 'dog whistle' device using a Raspberry Pi Zero, battery, and custom Python code. Inspired by Skywatcher's tech, we're sharing the complete DIY guide.
Is it possible to control a device with your mind alone? Check out my journey exploring the science behind mind-matter interaction in this two-part series.
Lynne McTaggart's The Intention Experiment is worth a read given its ambitious attempt to bridge the worlds of science, spirituality, and personal transformation. Read on to learn more.
Surprising research suggests mind-matter interaction works backwards in time: Instead of mental intention pushing forward to influence random events, desired outcomes may pull backwards through time to arrange their causes. Mind over matter or retrocausation?
Can human consciousness influence electronic systems? A strange 1996 patent from Princeton's PEAR lab describes a device that detects statistical anomalies in random numbers - supposedly caused by human intention - and uses them to control physical objects.
